• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Hamza, Y., Koraitim, T., Farag, M., Atwa, A. (2022). IMPACT OF USING SCALPEL VERSUS ELECTROCAUTARY AND DRAIN VERSUS NO DRAIN IN PAROTID SURGERY.. ALEXMED ePosters, 4(4), 11-12. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.169736.1488
Yasser Mohamed Hamza; Tarek Koraitim; Mostafa Mahmoud Farag; Ahmed Mohamed Atwa. "IMPACT OF USING SCALPEL VERSUS ELECTROCAUTARY AND DRAIN VERSUS NO DRAIN IN PAROTID SURGERY.". ALEXMED ePosters, 4, 4, 2022, 11-12. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.169736.1488
Hamza, Y., Koraitim, T., Farag, M., Atwa, A. (2022). 'IMPACT OF USING SCALPEL VERSUS ELECTROCAUTARY AND DRAIN VERSUS NO DRAIN IN PAROTID SURGERY.', ALEXMED ePosters, 4(4), pp. 11-12. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.169736.1488
Hamza, Y., Koraitim, T., Farag, M., Atwa, A. IMPACT OF USING SCALPEL VERSUS ELECTROCAUTARY AND DRAIN VERSUS NO DRAIN IN PAROTID SURGERY.. ALEXMED ePosters, 2022; 4(4): 11-12. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.169736.1488

IMPACT OF USING SCALPEL VERSUS ELECTROCAUTARY AND DRAIN VERSUS NO DRAIN IN PAROTID SURGERY.

Article 3, Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2022, Page 11-12  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.169736.1488
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Yasser Mohamed Hamza1; Tarek Koraitim2; Mostafa Mahmoud Farag3; Ahmed Mohamed Atwa email 3
1Head and neck unit, Surgery department, Faculty of medicine, Alexandria University
2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
3Head and Neck and Endocrine unit, Surgery department, Faculty of medicine, Alexandria university
Abstract
Introduction:
Parotid gland is a major salivary gland in the human body. It secrets saliva in the oral cavity to facilitate chewing and digestion. Parotidectomy is the partial or complete removal of the parotid gland. It is indicated for treatment of parotid inflammatory or neoplastic causes. The most common benign neoplastic causes are pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin’s tumor. Diagnosis for parotid lesions is made using ultrasonography, computed topography and MRI. Facial nerve paresis, great auricular nerve affection, seroma formation, haematoma formation, surgical site infection, skin flap necrosis and Frey’s syndrome are possible complications after parotidectomy. In parotidectomy, scalpel and electrocautary can be used in raising the skin flap. Parotidectomy has traditionally been completed with a drain insertion and overnight hospital stay, but now with the fine dissection and decrease the rate of complications of parotid surgery, the drainless parotidectomy is considered a safe procedure.
Aim of the work
The aim of the study was to compare between scalpel versus electrocautary in raising skin flap in parotid surgery as regards flap integrity, haematoma and seroma formation and to assess the impact of post-operative “no drainage” versus “drainage” in parotid surgery as regards analgesic requirements, seroma and haematoma formation.
Keywords
PAROTID SURGERY; DRAIN; SCALPEL
Supplementary Files
download 1488 Ahmed Mohamed Atwa.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 128
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.