• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Sorour, M., Kassem, M., Sabry, A., Hamdy, N. (2021). COMPARISON BETWEEN LIGASURE™ ASSISTED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY AND MILLIGAN-MORGAN HEMORRHOIDECTOMY. ALEXMED ePosters, 3(4), 87-88. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.103820.1303
Magdy Akel Sorour; Mohamed Ibrahim Kassem; Ahmed Abdelfattah Sabry; Nour Amr Hamdy. "COMPARISON BETWEEN LIGASURE™ ASSISTED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY AND MILLIGAN-MORGAN HEMORRHOIDECTOMY". ALEXMED ePosters, 3, 4, 2021, 87-88. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.103820.1303
Sorour, M., Kassem, M., Sabry, A., Hamdy, N. (2021). 'COMPARISON BETWEEN LIGASURE™ ASSISTED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY AND MILLIGAN-MORGAN HEMORRHOIDECTOMY', ALEXMED ePosters, 3(4), pp. 87-88. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.103820.1303
Sorour, M., Kassem, M., Sabry, A., Hamdy, N. COMPARISON BETWEEN LIGASURE™ ASSISTED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY AND MILLIGAN-MORGAN HEMORRHOIDECTOMY. ALEXMED ePosters, 2021; 3(4): 87-88. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.103820.1303

COMPARISON BETWEEN LIGASURE™ ASSISTED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY AND MILLIGAN-MORGAN HEMORRHOIDECTOMY

Article 1, Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2021, Page 87-88  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.103820.1303
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Magdy Akel Sorour1; Mohamed Ibrahim Kassem2; Ahmed Abdelfattah Sabry2; Nour Amr Hamdy email 3
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
2Department of Git surgery, faculty of medicine, Alexandria university
3Department ofGit surgery , faculty of medicine, alexandria university.
Abstract
Hemorrhoids are one of the most common anorectal disorders with a reported prevalence of 4.4% up to 36.4% of general population. The peak prevalence occurs between 45 and 65 years of age. The most common conventional surgical treatment are Milligan-Morgan (open) and Fergusons with electro-cautery hemorrhoidectomy (closed).
Compared with the scissors excision- ligation technique in Milligan-Morgan operation, diathermy and LigaSure™ were reported to have faster recovery and less pain.
The LigaSure™ Vessel Sealing System has been recently introduced as an instrument conceived to upgrade the conventional treatment of haemorrhoids: it consists of a bipolar electrothermal device which offers an optimised combination of pressure and radiofrequency, sealing blood vessels up to 7 mm in diameter and generating an energy tailored to the tissue impedance, with a thermal injury confined to 2 mm over the surgical site. This limited spread reduces anal spasm and allows to perform a bloodless haemorrhoidectomy with reduced postoperative pain and fast healing. Thus this operation can be recommended as the ideal technique because of the potential reduction in tissue trauma.
Keywords
Hemorrhoids; Ligasure; Milligan-Morgan
Supplementary Files
download 0087-1303 Presentation10 (4).pdf
Statistics
Article View: 208
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.