• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Abouheif, M., Moussa, M., Bedeir, Y., ElMallah, M. (2025). COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF PRIMARY ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING QUADRICEPS TENDON VERSUS HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFTS. ALEXMED ePosters, 7(2), 5-6. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.374322.2131
Mohamed Mahmoud Abouheif; Mena Michael Moussa; Yehia Hamdy Bedeir; Mohamed Adel ElMallah. "COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF PRIMARY ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING QUADRICEPS TENDON VERSUS HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFTS". ALEXMED ePosters, 7, 2, 2025, 5-6. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.374322.2131
Abouheif, M., Moussa, M., Bedeir, Y., ElMallah, M. (2025). 'COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF PRIMARY ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING QUADRICEPS TENDON VERSUS HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFTS', ALEXMED ePosters, 7(2), pp. 5-6. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.374322.2131
Abouheif, M., Moussa, M., Bedeir, Y., ElMallah, M. COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF PRIMARY ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING QUADRICEPS TENDON VERSUS HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFTS. ALEXMED ePosters, 2025; 7(2): 5-6. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.374322.2131

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF PRIMARY ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING QUADRICEPS TENDON VERSUS HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFTS

Article 1, Volume 7, Issue 2, April 2025, Page 5-6  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.374322.2131
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Mahmoud Abouheif1; Mena Michael Moussa2; Yehia Hamdy Bedeir2; Mohamed Adel ElMallah email 3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University.
3Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a popular orthopedic operation that requires careful graft selection. Several graft options are available, including hamstring tendon (HT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), peroneus longus tendon (PLT) and quadriceps tendon (QT). Traditionally, BPTB and HT autografts have been the most common choices. BPTB is regarded as the gold standard, however it may result in postoperative discomfort and an increased risk of OA. Hamstring tendons are less predictable and may reduce knee flexion. HT repair fails at a higher rate than BPTB, particularly among young athletes. Newer techniques with decreased soft tissue dissection yield a more robust and stable graft with comparable outcomes to BPTB and HT autografts. Consequently, the QT is emerging as an effective graft option, and recent studies highlight the increase in popularity of the QT autograft.

AIM:
This study aimed to compare the functional results following primary ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft and hamstring tendon autograft.

PATIENTS AND METHODOLOGY:
This was a prospective randomized clinical study. Forty patients were randomized to either the QT group (group 1: reconstruction was done for 20 patients with quadriceps tendon autograft) or the HT group (group 2: reconstruction was done for 20 patients with hamstring tendon autograft).
Evaluation was done clinically using the 2000 subjective IKDC score and the objective IKDC grading system in the second week postoperatively, after 3 months, after 6 months, and at the end of the follow-up, which was minimally 12 months postoperatively.
Keywords
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); hamstring tendon (HT); quadriceps tendon (QT)
Supplementary Files
download 2131 10 (91).pdf
Statistics
Article View: 17
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.