• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Bessa, S., Sharaan, M., Abdelbaki, T., Ahmed Mohamed Abdelhamid Elsahn, M. (2025). LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPROACH FOR REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 7(1), 58-59. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.365133.2109
Samer Saad Bessa; Mohamed Abdullah Sharaan; Tamer Nabil Abdelbaki; Mohamed Nabil Ahmed Mohamed Abdelhamid Elsahn. "LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPROACH FOR REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY". ALEXMED ePosters, 7, 1, 2025, 58-59. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.365133.2109
Bessa, S., Sharaan, M., Abdelbaki, T., Ahmed Mohamed Abdelhamid Elsahn, M. (2025). 'LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPROACH FOR REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY', ALEXMED ePosters, 7(1), pp. 58-59. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.365133.2109
Bessa, S., Sharaan, M., Abdelbaki, T., Ahmed Mohamed Abdelhamid Elsahn, M. LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPROACH FOR REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 2025; 7(1): 58-59. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.365133.2109

LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPROACH FOR REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Article 1, Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2025, Page 58-59  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.365133.2109
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Samer Saad Bessa1; Mohamed Abdullah Sharaan2; Tamer Nabil Abdelbaki3; Mohamed Nabil Ahmed Mohamed Abdelhamid Elsahn email 2
1Hepatobiliarypancreatic unit, Surgery department, Faculty of medicine, Alexandria university
2Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
3Hepatobiliary pancreatic unit, Surgery department , Faculty of medicine, Alexandria university
Abstract
Introduction:
PUD is prevalent, with a lifetime prevalence of 5-10% and an annual incidence of 0.1-0.3%. The yearly incidence of perforation varies from 0.004 to 0.014%. It remains the second most common cause of gastrointestinal perforation, necessitating urgent surgery, and the leading cause for gastric emergency surgery. The risk factors for PPU include NSAIDs, H. pylori, physiological stress, smoking, corticosteroids, and a history of PUD. The decrease in complications related to peptic ulcer disease may be linked to the global prevalence of antisecretory medications and a more judicious application of NSAIDs compared to previous practices. Peptic ulcer perforation usually manifests with an abrupt onset of severe pain in the epigastrium. Depending on the age of the patient and comorbid factors, fatalities can be as high as 20%.PPU is predominantly surgical, with various suture techniques outlined for the closure of the perforation. Laparoscopic omental patch repair (LOPR) for PPU was accomplished thirty years ago. early prospective studies effectively established the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic repair.
Keywords
open repair; laparoscopic; omental patch
Supplementary Files
download 2109 Mohamed Nabil 3.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 19
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.