DRAIN VERSUS NO DRAIN AFTER OPEN MESH REPAIR FOR INGUINAL HERNIA: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

Document Type : Preliminary preprint short reports of original research

Authors

1 General Surgery Department - Gastrointestinal Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria

2 Gastroenterology (GIT) Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria

3 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University.

Abstract

The inguinal canal is a common site for hernias, especially in males, due to its structural weaknesses. An inguinal hernia occurs when an organ or tissue protrudes through the inguinal region of the abdominal wall.
Surgical drains are manufactured tubes used to evacuate various body fluids and have been an integral part of surgical procedures for many years. Their applications can be broadly classified into prophylactic and therapeutic categories.
Surgical wound complications pose significant challenges in postoperative care, often leading to prolonged hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and adverse patient outcomes. Common complications include seroma, hematoma, surgical site infection (SSI), and wound dehiscence. Understanding these complications, their etiology, and management is crucial for improving surgical outcomes and patient safety.
Aim of the Work:
The aim of this study was to compare the role of prophylactic subcutaneous drain versus no drain after open mesh repair for inguinal hernia in order to assess its value in decreasing postoperative seroma, hematoma formation, scrotal edema, wound dehiscence and wound infection.

Keywords

ALEXMED ePosters
Volume 6, Issue 4
September 2024
Pages 76-77

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics