• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
hosny, T., Abdel-Moneim, H., Elatfy, A. (2024). INCIDENCE OF CESAREAN SCAR DEFECT IN CASES OF CESAREAN SECTION WITH AND WITHOUT BLADDER FLAP DISSECTION. ALEXMED ePosters, 6(3), 33-34. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.307763.1900
Tamer Ahmed hosny; Hesham M. Adel Abdel-Moneim; Ahmed Ebrahim AbdElAziz Ebrahim Elatfy. "INCIDENCE OF CESAREAN SCAR DEFECT IN CASES OF CESAREAN SECTION WITH AND WITHOUT BLADDER FLAP DISSECTION". ALEXMED ePosters, 6, 3, 2024, 33-34. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.307763.1900
hosny, T., Abdel-Moneim, H., Elatfy, A. (2024). 'INCIDENCE OF CESAREAN SCAR DEFECT IN CASES OF CESAREAN SECTION WITH AND WITHOUT BLADDER FLAP DISSECTION', ALEXMED ePosters, 6(3), pp. 33-34. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.307763.1900
hosny, T., Abdel-Moneim, H., Elatfy, A. INCIDENCE OF CESAREAN SCAR DEFECT IN CASES OF CESAREAN SECTION WITH AND WITHOUT BLADDER FLAP DISSECTION. ALEXMED ePosters, 2024; 6(3): 33-34. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.307763.1900

INCIDENCE OF CESAREAN SCAR DEFECT IN CASES OF CESAREAN SECTION WITH AND WITHOUT BLADDER FLAP DISSECTION

Article 1, Volume 6, Issue 3, July 2024, Page 33-34  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.307763.1900
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Tamer Ahmed hosny1; Hesham M. Adel Abdel-Moneim2; Ahmed Ebrahim AbdElAziz Ebrahim Elatfy email 2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of medicine, Alexandria University.
Abstract
Uterine niche is an iatrogenic pouch-like defect at the site of previous caesarean scar due to defective tissue healing. Uterine niche occurs in up to 70% women with previous cesarean of whom 30% are symptomatic. Reported prevalence varies: 24–70% with transvaginal sonography (TVS), Lower uterine incision towards the cervix, Cesarean section done in advanced labour after cervical effacement, Single-layer, decidua sparing closure technique predisposes to incomplete closure, Non- perpendicular sutures leading to an irregular myometrial closure, locking sutures or very tight second layer leading to is necrosis resulting poorly healed scar predisposing to niche formation. Thus, double-layer uterine closure using non-locking sutures is the optimal closure technique that results in thicker residual myometrium and hence potentially lower risk of niches.

Aim:
The aim of this study was to compare Incidence of cesarean scar defect in cases of cesarean section with and without bladder flap dissection

Patients and Methods:
268 women were randomly divided into two equal groups using double blind method with closed envelopes
• Group (A) 134 were subjected to traditional cesarean section with bladderflap dissection after blunt entry into peritoneum and before entry to uterus.
• Group (B) 134 were subjected to traditional cesarean section with entry into uterus directly after blunt entry into peritoneum without bladder flap dissection.
Keywords
CESAREAN SCAR DEFECT; Uterine niche; isthmocele
Supplementary Files
download 1900 10 (53).pdf
Statistics
Article View: 58
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.