• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Talaat, M., Eldeeb, M., Ahmed, M., Saad Mohamed Kouzo, M. (2024). COMPARISON BETWEEN BEHAVIOURAL-BASED MAPPING AND ESRT-BASED MAPPING IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTEES. ALEXMED ePosters, 6(3), 29-30. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.306884.1897
mohamed aziz Talaat; Mirhan Eldeeb; Mai Mohamed El Ghazaly Ahmed; Mohamed Hesham Saad Mohamed Kouzo. "COMPARISON BETWEEN BEHAVIOURAL-BASED MAPPING AND ESRT-BASED MAPPING IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTEES". ALEXMED ePosters, 6, 3, 2024, 29-30. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.306884.1897
Talaat, M., Eldeeb, M., Ahmed, M., Saad Mohamed Kouzo, M. (2024). 'COMPARISON BETWEEN BEHAVIOURAL-BASED MAPPING AND ESRT-BASED MAPPING IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTEES', ALEXMED ePosters, 6(3), pp. 29-30. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.306884.1897
Talaat, M., Eldeeb, M., Ahmed, M., Saad Mohamed Kouzo, M. COMPARISON BETWEEN BEHAVIOURAL-BASED MAPPING AND ESRT-BASED MAPPING IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTEES. ALEXMED ePosters, 2024; 6(3): 29-30. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.306884.1897

COMPARISON BETWEEN BEHAVIOURAL-BASED MAPPING AND ESRT-BASED MAPPING IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTEES

Article 1, Volume 6, Issue 3, July 2024, Page 29-30  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2024.306884.1897
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
mohamed aziz Talaat1; Mirhan Eldeeborcid 2; Mai Mohamed El Ghazaly Ahmed3; Mohamed Hesham Saad Mohamed Kouzo email 3
1Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Audiology unit, Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Egypt
3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Audiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Cochlear implants (CIs) are the one of the first examples of a neural prosthesis that can substitute a sensory organ to directly stimulate the auditory nerve. The core functions of a CI are to convert the input sounds into meaningful electrical stimulation patterns, and then to deliver these patterns to the auditory nerve fibers through a number of electrodes. The initial programming data include setting threshold levels (T-levels) and comfortable levels (C-levels). Accurate programming of these levels is required for a good map to access hearing and speech perception with the CI. Contraction of the stapedial muscle can be elicited by an adequate electrical stimulus. Electrically evoked stapedius reflex (ESR) has a threshold and demonstrates amplitude growth till saturation. Using Electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold (ESRT)-based maps can be an objective method to program both adult and especially pediatric implantees, where behavioural responses are difficult to obtain. The goal of this study will be to compare ESRT-based mapping and behavioural-based mapping and whether if an ESRT-based mapping is a reliable and effective alternative for behavioural-based mapping when the latter cannot be obtained.
Keywords
BEHAVIOURAL; MAPPING; ESRT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTEES
Supplementary Files
download 1897 19 (75).pdf
Statistics
Article View: 83
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.