• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Elkassar, Y., Toppozada, T., Rageh, A., Yassien Mahmoud Hamad, M. (2023). OBSTETRIC OUTCOME IN FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER VERSUS FROZEN-THAWED EMBRYO TRANSFER. ALEXMED ePosters, 5(4), 51-52. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.257517.1752
Yasser Elkassar; Tarek Mokhtar Hussein Toppozada; Ahmed Shoukry Abdelmoneim Rageh; Mahmoud Adel Yassien Mahmoud Hamad. "OBSTETRIC OUTCOME IN FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER VERSUS FROZEN-THAWED EMBRYO TRANSFER". ALEXMED ePosters, 5, 4, 2023, 51-52. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.257517.1752
Elkassar, Y., Toppozada, T., Rageh, A., Yassien Mahmoud Hamad, M. (2023). 'OBSTETRIC OUTCOME IN FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER VERSUS FROZEN-THAWED EMBRYO TRANSFER', ALEXMED ePosters, 5(4), pp. 51-52. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.257517.1752
Elkassar, Y., Toppozada, T., Rageh, A., Yassien Mahmoud Hamad, M. OBSTETRIC OUTCOME IN FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER VERSUS FROZEN-THAWED EMBRYO TRANSFER. ALEXMED ePosters, 2023; 5(4): 51-52. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.257517.1752

OBSTETRIC OUTCOME IN FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER VERSUS FROZEN-THAWED EMBRYO TRANSFER

Article 1, Volume 5, Issue 4, December 2023, Page 51-52  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.257517.1752
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Yasser Elkassar1; Tarek Mokhtar Hussein Toppozada2; Ahmed Shoukry Abdelmoneim Rageh3; Mahmoud Adel Yassien Mahmoud Hamad email 4
1Alexandria university obstetric&gynecology
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine University of Alexandria
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
At first, fresh embryo transfers were viewed as superior and produced significantly greater success rates. Nowadays, the process of freezing and thawing embryos has significantly improved. So, the choice between fresh vs. frozen transfer is much more nuanced.
Since the first live birth following the transfer of thawed embryos in 1984, the proportion of frozen embryo transfersin the United Kingdom has increased from 10.1% in 1991 to 41.2% in 2019.
It is known that obstetricoutcomes in singleton ICSI pregnancies are worse than those after spontaneous conceptions.
With regard to maternal complications, some studies had showed that frozen- thawed ET was associated with lower risks of placenta previa and preterm delivery than fresh ET. On the other hand, frozen-thawed ET may contribute to an increased risk of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus.
Inthis study, wecompared between the obstetrics outcomes of fresh versus frozen embryo transfer.

AIM OF THE WORK:
The aim of this study was to analyze the obstetric outcomes in singleton pregnancies achieved after fresh embryo transfer versus transfer of frozen-thawed embryo, to compare their effects on some major obstetric complications after ICSI cycles that have not been reported in previous studies.
Keywords
OUTCOME; THAWED; FRESH; EMBRYOS
Supplementary Files
download 1752 20 (4).pdf
Statistics
Article View: 59
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.