• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Arida, E., Omar, S., Abd El-Hady, M., Khamis, Z. (2023). COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PRILOCAINE 2% AND BUPIVACAINE 0.5% IN SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION.. ALEXMED ePosters, 5(1), 38-39. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.198498.1581
Emad Abd-ElMonem Arida; Sherif Younis Omar; Mohamed Mahmoud Abd El-Hady; Zakaria Khamis Khamis. "COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PRILOCAINE 2% AND BUPIVACAINE 0.5% IN SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION.". ALEXMED ePosters, 5, 1, 2023, 38-39. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.198498.1581
Arida, E., Omar, S., Abd El-Hady, M., Khamis, Z. (2023). 'COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PRILOCAINE 2% AND BUPIVACAINE 0.5% IN SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION.', ALEXMED ePosters, 5(1), pp. 38-39. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.198498.1581
Arida, E., Omar, S., Abd El-Hady, M., Khamis, Z. COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PRILOCAINE 2% AND BUPIVACAINE 0.5% IN SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION.. ALEXMED ePosters, 2023; 5(1): 38-39. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.198498.1581

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PRILOCAINE 2% AND BUPIVACAINE 0.5% IN SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION.

Article 1, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2023, Page 38-39  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2023.198498.1581
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Emad Abd-ElMonem Arida1; Sherif Younis Omar1; Mohamed Mahmoud Abd El-Hady2; Zakaria Khamis Khamis email 1
1Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine - Alexandria University
2Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria
Abstract
Caesarean section is one of the most performed surgery in some parts of USA with the rate increasing from 20.6 percent in 1997 to 31.5 percent in 2009. Current C-section rate in Europe ranges from 19 percent to 33 percent in South America from 30 percent to 50 percent and in Africa and other regions, C-section rates are rising with wide disparities being observed.
Two recent studies indicate that in Africa, the national C-section rate of two percent was reported in Burkina Faso compared to the rate of 52 percent in Egypt, indicating a similar pattern of extreme variation in C-section rates.
Indications for caesarean delivery:
Indications for caesarean delivery may be broadly classified into 3 groups:
a. Maternal indications
b. Fetal indications
c. Combined Maternal-fetal indications
AIM OF THE WORK:
The aim of this study was to compare between Hyperbaric prilocaine vs. hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in women undergoing elective caesarean.
Primary aim: Efficacy of the block as regard duration, time of onset, potency and the level of the block between 2% hyperbaric Prilocaine and hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine in Spinal anesthesia for caesarean section.
Secondary aim: Intra-operative and post-operative complications of Spinal Anaesthesia.
Keywords
PRILOCAINE; BUPIVACAINE; IN SPINAL ANAESTHESIA
Supplementary Files
download 1581 22.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 196
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.