• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
El-daly, A., Bahgat, A., Salem Nasser, M. (2022). COMPARISON BETWEEN ADENOIDECTOMY BY COBLATION VERSUS MICRODEBRIDER VERSUS CURETTAGE IN PEDIATRIC AGE GROUP. ALEXMED ePosters, 4(4), 38-39. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.176081.1520
Ahmed Salah El-din El-daly; Ahmed Yassin Bahgat; Mohamed Essam Salem Nasser. "COMPARISON BETWEEN ADENOIDECTOMY BY COBLATION VERSUS MICRODEBRIDER VERSUS CURETTAGE IN PEDIATRIC AGE GROUP". ALEXMED ePosters, 4, 4, 2022, 38-39. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.176081.1520
El-daly, A., Bahgat, A., Salem Nasser, M. (2022). 'COMPARISON BETWEEN ADENOIDECTOMY BY COBLATION VERSUS MICRODEBRIDER VERSUS CURETTAGE IN PEDIATRIC AGE GROUP', ALEXMED ePosters, 4(4), pp. 38-39. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.176081.1520
El-daly, A., Bahgat, A., Salem Nasser, M. COMPARISON BETWEEN ADENOIDECTOMY BY COBLATION VERSUS MICRODEBRIDER VERSUS CURETTAGE IN PEDIATRIC AGE GROUP. ALEXMED ePosters, 2022; 4(4): 38-39. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.176081.1520

COMPARISON BETWEEN ADENOIDECTOMY BY COBLATION VERSUS MICRODEBRIDER VERSUS CURETTAGE IN PEDIATRIC AGE GROUP

Article 4, Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2022, Page 38-39  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.176081.1520
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed Salah El-din El-daly1; Ahmed Yassin Bahgat2; Mohamed Essam Salem Nasser email 1
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
2Department of otorhinolaryngology,faculty of medicine .Alexandria university
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Adenoidectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries worldwide. Since the earliest descriptions of adenoidectomy, numerous techniques have been described and used successfully either used alone or in combinations. With the development of endoscopic sinus surgery instrumentation, the standard surgical procedure using an adenoid curette has advanced, improving patient outcomes and increasing surgeon satisfaction. All techniques are based on the principle of the adequate removal of the adenoids without damage to the surrounding structures, such as the torus tubarus, the palate, the posterior pharyngeal wall, and the choana. Dissatisfaction with the traditional adenoidectomy due to inadequate removal of the adenoid tissue and poor visualization, as well as the significant advancement in fiberoptic and endoscopic instruments, both contributed to the development of alternative adenoidectomy techniques, such as endoscopic guided and power aided techniques. Recent studies have revealed that when choosing a technique for an adenoidectomy, effectiveness is the most crucial consideration and the cost is the least crucial. There are numerous adenoidectomy techniques, however, few studies compare more than two different types of instruments in a single analysis.
Keywords
ADENOIDECTOMY; COBLATION; MICRODEBRIDER; CURETTAGE
Supplementary Files
download 1520 Mohamed Essam Salem Nasser.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 153
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.