• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
AbdElrahman, A., Ahmed, M., Ingabire, M. (2022). 3D ULTRASOUND VERSUS OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY IN UTERINE CAVITY ASSESSMENT IN CASES OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY.. ALEXMED ePosters, 4(3), 3-4. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.148801.1431
Ashraf Hany AbdElrahman; Mohamed Elmahdy Ahmed; Marius Trésor Ingabire. "3D ULTRASOUND VERSUS OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY IN UTERINE CAVITY ASSESSMENT IN CASES OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY.". ALEXMED ePosters, 4, 3, 2022, 3-4. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.148801.1431
AbdElrahman, A., Ahmed, M., Ingabire, M. (2022). '3D ULTRASOUND VERSUS OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY IN UTERINE CAVITY ASSESSMENT IN CASES OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY.', ALEXMED ePosters, 4(3), pp. 3-4. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.148801.1431
AbdElrahman, A., Ahmed, M., Ingabire, M. 3D ULTRASOUND VERSUS OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY IN UTERINE CAVITY ASSESSMENT IN CASES OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY.. ALEXMED ePosters, 2022; 4(3): 3-4. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.148801.1431

3D ULTRASOUND VERSUS OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY IN UTERINE CAVITY ASSESSMENT IN CASES OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY.

Article 3, Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2022, Page 3-4  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.148801.1431
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ashraf Hany AbdElrahman1; Mohamed Elmahdy Ahmedorcid 2; Marius Trésor Ingabire email 3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt.
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria
Abstract
Evaluation of the uterine cavity is an important step in the investigation of infertile women. Hysteroscopy is considered the gold standard diagnostic modality and is invasive; therefore, an investigation that overcomes its limitations is needed. 3D transvaginal ultrasound (3D TVS) can non-invasively visualize uterine morphology and simultaneously record all three imaging planes, an alternative to hysteroscopy.
AIM OF THE WORK:
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy between 3D ultrasound and office hysteroscopy to evaluate uterine cavity in cases of unexplained infertility.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
This study was carried out on 80 infertile female patients suffering for unexplained infertility recruited from the infertility clinic of El- Shatby University Maternity Hospital between April 2021 to October 2021. All cases underwent transvaginal ultrasound and the uterus was examined in longitudinal and transverse plane (2D and 3D transvaginal ultrasound), and office hysteroscopy examination was done for all cases.
RESULTS:
In Hysteroscopy, there were 51.3% with Overall abnormality, 18.8 % with Endometrial Polyp, 10.0% with Submucous myoma, 7.5% with Adhesions, 8.8% with Chronic endometritis, 2.5 % with Uterine abnormality, 2.5% with ostia abnormality, 1.3% with Adenomysis.
Keywords
Three D transvaginal ultrasound; hysteroscopy; uterine cavity abnormality; infertility
Supplementary Files
download 1431 10.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 136
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.