• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Bessa, S., Sharaan, M., Abdelaziz, M., Saad elnemr, M. (2022). SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 4(1), 48-49. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373
Samer Saad Bessa; Mohamed Abdalla Sharaan; Mohamed Rabie Abdelaziz; Mohammed Maamon Saad elnemr. "SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY". ALEXMED ePosters, 4, 1, 2022, 48-49. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373
Bessa, S., Sharaan, M., Abdelaziz, M., Saad elnemr, M. (2022). 'SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY', ALEXMED ePosters, 4(1), pp. 48-49. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373
Bessa, S., Sharaan, M., Abdelaziz, M., Saad elnemr, M. SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 2022; 4(1): 48-49. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373

SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY

Article 1, Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2022, Page 48-49  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Samer Saad Bessa1; Mohamed Abdalla Sharaan1; Mohamed Rabie Abdelaziz2; Mohammed Maamon Saad elnemr email 2
1Hepatobiliarypancreatic unit, Surgery department, Faculty of medicine, Alexandria university
2Department of Surgery Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Gallstone disease constitutes a worldwide major health problem as it is responsible for 1.4 million visits and 750,000 cholecystectomies per year in the United States. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the “Gold standard” for treatment of symptomatic gallstone diseaseand is one of the most common abdominal laparoscopic procedures worldwide.Intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder is among the common complications to be taken into consideration as bile or stone spillage could give rise to early or late postoperative complications. It has been reported to occur with a range of 10% - 36% in different studies. To avoid sequalae of GB perforation especially surgical site infection (SSI), several methods and devices have been used for gallbladder retrieval from the abdominal cavity following LC. No one method has been shown to be superior to another.

AIM OF THE WORK:
The aim of this randomized comparative study is to compare the surgical site infections and / or complications with and without the use of a powder-free surgical glove bag for gallbladder retrieval following iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gallstone disease.
Keywords
GLOVE BAG; RETRIEVAL; GB perforation
Supplementary Files
download 1373 14.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 235
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.