• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Abdulrazik, A., Bessa, S., Abdelbaki, T., Talaat Hassan, A. (2022). COMPARISON BETWEEN DAY-CASE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PERFORMED UNDER STRICT VERSUS RELAXED CRITERIA: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 4(1), 19-20. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.118882.1354
Alaa Hussein Abdulrazik; Samer Saad Bessa; Tamer Nabil Abdelbaki; Ahmed Amin Talaat Hassan. "COMPARISON BETWEEN DAY-CASE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PERFORMED UNDER STRICT VERSUS RELAXED CRITERIA: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY". ALEXMED ePosters, 4, 1, 2022, 19-20. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.118882.1354
Abdulrazik, A., Bessa, S., Abdelbaki, T., Talaat Hassan, A. (2022). 'COMPARISON BETWEEN DAY-CASE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PERFORMED UNDER STRICT VERSUS RELAXED CRITERIA: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY', ALEXMED ePosters, 4(1), pp. 19-20. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.118882.1354
Abdulrazik, A., Bessa, S., Abdelbaki, T., Talaat Hassan, A. COMPARISON BETWEEN DAY-CASE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PERFORMED UNDER STRICT VERSUS RELAXED CRITERIA: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 2022; 4(1): 19-20. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.118882.1354

COMPARISON BETWEEN DAY-CASE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PERFORMED UNDER STRICT VERSUS RELAXED CRITERIA: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Article 1, Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2022, Page 19-20  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.118882.1354
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Alaa Hussein Abdulrazik1; Samer Saad Bessa1; Tamer Nabil Abdelbaki2; Ahmed Amin Talaat Hassan email 2
1Hepatobiliarypancreatic unit, Surgery department, Faculty of medicine, Alexandria university
2Hepato-pancreaticobiliary surgery unit, surgery department, faculty of medicine, Alexandria university
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the ‘gold standard’ for treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. The potential for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to be performed as a day case surgery was first recognized in 1990. Nowadays laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely performed on day-case basis in many countries, like United States and United Kingdom. Advantages of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) over inpatient LC include early return to the community and work, providing a substantial reduction in hospital costs, avoiding complications associated with hospital stay. Several published studies have testified to the safety and feasibility of DCLC and nearly all of them confirmed that DCLC is safe for most of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under specific inclusion criteria and appropriate postoperative assessment.

AIM OF THE WORK
The aim of the present prospective study was to compare between the surgical outcomes of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed under strict versus relaxed criteria in the Alexandria Main University Hospital (AMUH).
Keywords
DAY-CASE; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; RELAXED CRITERIA
Supplementary Files
download 1354 Ahmed Amin Talaat Hassan.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 127
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.