• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Serageldin, M. (2021). MONOPOLAR VS BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE REGARDING THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE URETHRAL STRICTURE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 3(4), 57-58. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.97868.1281
Mohamed Ibrahim Serageldin. "MONOPOLAR VS BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE REGARDING THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE URETHRAL STRICTURE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY". ALEXMED ePosters, 3, 4, 2021, 57-58. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.97868.1281
Serageldin, M. (2021). 'MONOPOLAR VS BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE REGARDING THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE URETHRAL STRICTURE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY', ALEXMED ePosters, 3(4), pp. 57-58. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.97868.1281
Serageldin, M. MONOPOLAR VS BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE REGARDING THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE URETHRAL STRICTURE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 2021; 3(4): 57-58. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.97868.1281

MONOPOLAR VS BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE REGARDING THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE URETHRAL STRICTURE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY

Article 226, Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2021, Page 57-58  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.97868.1281
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Mohamed Ibrahim Serageldin email
Department of Genitourinary Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a very common illness affecting aged men, about half of patients will at some time need surgical intervention.
Monopolar TURPis considered as the gold standard for the surgical treatment of BPH. Multiple studies showed higher complication rates in M-TURP operations in patients with large prostate volumes. The risk of hemorrhage is also higher specially in patients with blood disorders.
Bipolar TURP, an electric current completes its circuit outside the body of the patients. This permits the use of saline as irrigating fluid, preventing the TUR syndrome and hyponatremia. Addionally B-TURP is associated with less bleeding and less operative time.
The incidence of urethral stricture after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) ranges from 2.2 to 9.8%. Most of the cases occurs within 6 months of transurethral surgery. Presentation is likely with weak flow, infection or acute urinary retention.
The exact etiology of urethral stricture after TURP is still unknown. Suggested causes after TURP include infection, mechanical trauma, prolonged indwellingcatheter time,local anesthesia, and electrical injury.
Keywords
URETHRAL STRICTURE; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; INCIDENCE
Supplementary Files
download 0057-1281 د.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 137
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.