• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Atef, M. (2021). COMPARISON BETWEEN PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE LOCAL COBB ANGLE AFTER MONOSEGMENTAL UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (PLIF). ALEXMED ePosters, 3(2), 55-56. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.79214.1174
Mohamed Atef. "COMPARISON BETWEEN PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE LOCAL COBB ANGLE AFTER MONOSEGMENTAL UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (PLIF)". ALEXMED ePosters, 3, 2, 2021, 55-56. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.79214.1174
Atef, M. (2021). 'COMPARISON BETWEEN PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE LOCAL COBB ANGLE AFTER MONOSEGMENTAL UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (PLIF)', ALEXMED ePosters, 3(2), pp. 55-56. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.79214.1174
Atef, M. COMPARISON BETWEEN PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE LOCAL COBB ANGLE AFTER MONOSEGMENTAL UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (PLIF). ALEXMED ePosters, 2021; 3(2): 55-56. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.79214.1174

COMPARISON BETWEEN PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE LOCAL COBB ANGLE AFTER MONOSEGMENTAL UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (PLIF)

Article 124, Volume 3, Issue 2, June 2021, Page 55-56  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.79214.1174
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Mohamed Atef email
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
Abstract
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), described by Cloward in 1943, is the gold standard nowadays in the treatment of spondylol is thes is and degenerative disc disease. The benefits of the procedure are secure fixation of the vertebral body, maintaining the intervertebral space height, and supporting the anterior column, thus providing satisfactory bone fusion while maintaining biomechanical stability. The unilateral pedicle screw PLIF has similar outcomes clinically. However, because the unilateral pedicle screw involves a shorter surgical time, less blood loss, decreases the stiffness of the instrumented segment, and leaving the muscles on one side undisturbed decreases postoperative pain and helps better rehabilitation. Therefore, unilateral pedicle screw PLIF might be more suitable in performing single segment pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion. This research was conducted aiming to compare between PLIF with unilateral and bilateral fixation in restoring segmental lordosis by measuring local Cobb angle pre and post-operatively.
Aim of the work
This study aims to compare between pre and post-operative local Cobb angle after PLIF either with unilateral or bilateral fixation, using PEEK cages
Keywords
unilateral; PLIF; COBB angle
Supplementary Files
download 0055-1174 Mohamed-Atef-Mohamed-Aly.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 154
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.