• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
shenit, K. (2021). LOOP TRANSVERSE COLOSTOMY VERSUS LOOP IELOSTOMY FOR DEFUNCTIONING OF COLORECTAL AND COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS: A RANDOMISED PROSPECTIVE STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 3(1), 10-11. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.57391.1105
karim Mahmoud shenit. "LOOP TRANSVERSE COLOSTOMY VERSUS LOOP IELOSTOMY FOR DEFUNCTIONING OF COLORECTAL AND COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS: A RANDOMISED PROSPECTIVE STUDY". ALEXMED ePosters, 3, 1, 2021, 10-11. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.57391.1105
shenit, K. (2021). 'LOOP TRANSVERSE COLOSTOMY VERSUS LOOP IELOSTOMY FOR DEFUNCTIONING OF COLORECTAL AND COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS: A RANDOMISED PROSPECTIVE STUDY', ALEXMED ePosters, 3(1), pp. 10-11. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.57391.1105
shenit, K. LOOP TRANSVERSE COLOSTOMY VERSUS LOOP IELOSTOMY FOR DEFUNCTIONING OF COLORECTAL AND COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS: A RANDOMISED PROSPECTIVE STUDY. ALEXMED ePosters, 2021; 3(1): 10-11. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.57391.1105

LOOP TRANSVERSE COLOSTOMY VERSUS LOOP IELOSTOMY FOR DEFUNCTIONING OF COLORECTAL AND COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS: A RANDOMISED PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Article 10, Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2021, Page 10-11  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.57391.1105
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
karim Mahmoud shenit email
department of colorectal surgery Alexandria university
Abstract
The change in the paradigm that started with the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) by Heald dramatically increased the rate of sphincter-preserving low-anterior resection.TME became accepted as a standard procedure because of the observed low recurrence rate and prolonged survival
The incidence of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection and TME was reduced by the defunctioning loop stoma but There is still some debate as to whether loop transverse colostomy or loop ileostomy is the correct way of defunctioning such anastomosis
Is to compare loop transverse colostomy versus loop ileostomy for defunctionning of colorectal and coloanal anastomosis
This is aprospective study that included forty patients that were diagnosed with rectal cancerandadmitted to colorectal surgery unit and Patients were divided into two groups randomly, one group was subjected to loop transverse colostomy (group A) and the other group was subjected to loop ileostomy(group B).
We compared both groups as regard: operative time, post-operative complications, postoperative quality of life,and stoma reversal complication. The mean period of follow up was three months postoperative.
Keywords
transverse colostomy; ileostomy; stoma
Supplementary Files
download 1105 Presentation31.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 205
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.