• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
ALEXMED ePosters
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2025)
Volume Volume 6 (2024)
Volume Volume 5 (2023)
Volume Volume 4 (2022)
Volume Volume 3 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2020)
Volume Volume 1 (2019)
Hemead, H. (2021). COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE RESULTS OF ON-PUMP VERSUS OFF-PUMP CORONARY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY. ALEXMED ePosters, 3(1), 9-10. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.56871.1104
Hanan Mamdouh Hemead. "COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE RESULTS OF ON-PUMP VERSUS OFF-PUMP CORONARY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY". ALEXMED ePosters, 3, 1, 2021, 9-10. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.56871.1104
Hemead, H. (2021). 'COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE RESULTS OF ON-PUMP VERSUS OFF-PUMP CORONARY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY', ALEXMED ePosters, 3(1), pp. 9-10. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.56871.1104
Hemead, H. COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE RESULTS OF ON-PUMP VERSUS OFF-PUMP CORONARY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY. ALEXMED ePosters, 2021; 3(1): 9-10. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.56871.1104

COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE RESULTS OF ON-PUMP VERSUS OFF-PUMP CORONARY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY

Article 9, Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2021, Page 9-10  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2021.56871.1104
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Hanan Mamdouh Hemead email
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Abstract
Assisted by cardiopulmonary machine (CPB), CABG surgery is performed safely with excellent outcomes. Due to the adverse events linked to the CPB, the off-pump CABG becomes an acceptable alternative particularly in patients with calcified proximal aorta. Critics of off-pump CABG often refer to the long learning curve and difficult building cumulative surgical experience. Off-pump CABG has been always a matter of debate. Off-pump CABG becomes highly appealing due to minimal invasiveness of the procedure, suitability to some population and better early outcomes.
Aim:
This study evaluates the early postoperative outcomes of off-pump CABG compared to on-pump CABG.
Subjects& methods:
First eligible comers in the period between 2018-2019.The following points were compared between the two groups Amount of bleeding, length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, operative time, completion of revascularization, complications; atrial fibrillation, neurological deficits, acute kidney injury.
Conclusion:
The argument surrounding the potential advantages and safety of the off-pump is difficult to be settled. Off-pump CABG, in the hands of trained surgeons, offers favorable short-term outcomes particularly in patients with complex co-morbidities. It is highly indicated in heavily calcified aorta to avoid the thromboembolic events.The decision should be made on individual basis, taking into consideration the potential long-term adverse outcomes.
Keywords
CABG; Off-pump; CPB
Supplementary Files
download 1104 Presentation3 (3).pdf
Statistics
Article View: 248
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.